Philenews

Maduro's Ouster Doesn't Guarantee a U.S. Victory in Venezuela

Published January 7, 2026, 08:15
Maduro's Ouster Doesn't Guarantee a U.S. Victory in Venezuela

The ousting of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela by the U.S. is considered a short-term victory for the American government, as Maduro had been accused of electoral fraud, suppression of the opposition, and economic devastation of the country. However, the article emphasizes the long-term risks of U.S. intervention, such as undermining international legality and strengthening U.S. adversaries like Russia and China. Furthermore, bypassing the U.S. Congress raises concerns about potential overreach of executive power. The main argument is that simply removing Maduro does not guarantee a successful democratic transition or economic recovery for Venezuela. Even if the new regime, currently led by Delcy Rodriguez, is willing to cooperate with the U.S., there is a risk of consolidating the status quo rather than promoting democracy. The refusal to support María Corina Machado, who leads the fight for democracy, is seen as a negative sign. The article expresses fears of increased political repression and corruption, which could lead to greater discontent towards the U.S. and an increase in migration. Additionally, the possibility of drug gangs and other armed groups continuing to control parts of the country creates further challenges for security and stability. To avoid such an outcome, the article highlights the need for continuous and steady diplomacy from the U.S. A simple military intervention is not enough to achieve a sustainable solution in Venezuela. The focus should be on promoting democracy, economic development, and combating corruption through negotiations and cooperation.